Quote from: Gobotak on April 08, 2024, 11:36:40 AMI would be fine with each filter being a first order filter if that saves on the number of required components.No, I think you've taken the right path going with 2-pole filters in both cases. You won't get effective feedback with a single pole filter.
QuoteThis is what I have drawn up for the low pass filter:The filter looks good to me. It's basically two stages of the classic four-stage synth filter, with the pole-mixing bandpass feedback from Fig.33 in the app note.
I'm going for bandpass resonance to avoid passband attenuation when using increased resonance. I'm wondering if the polarity of my resonant signal matters.
QuoteIf I am understanding correctly, each filter stage results in a 45 degree phase shift at the corner frequency so I would get a phase shift of 90 degrees from the filters.Correct.
QuoteI am using a VCA for the resonance so I get another 180 totaling 270.No. The *VCA* itself is inverting, but it's followed by an I-to-V op-amp stage (U4.2 in your lowpass schematic) which is also inverting, so there's no net inversion through the typical whole 2164 VCA schematic. <later note>I'm wrong! see further down the thread!
QuoteThis is the high pass filter:For the classic 4-pole case, the highpass version of the filter has the same problem as the lowpass version - the fed-back passband signal cancels the signal coming through the filter. So yes, I'd guess the bandpass feedback improves the situation for the highpass circuit just the same too.
Again I am going for bandpass resonance but I am not sure if it is needed.
QuoteAs is I would need 2 ssi2164s using 6 of the 8 VCAs leaving me two extra VCAs for other purposes.Yep! 3 VCAs needed for each two-pole filter with VC-resonance, and two left over for actual VCA duties, maybe?!
Page created in 0.167 seconds with 16 queries.