|HOME| |DIY FAQ| |GEO FAQ| |Debugging Page| |Links| |Schematics| |Wiki| |Layouts Gallery| |STORE|
|AMPAGE| |GEOFEX| |AMZ|

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 29, 2014, 12:39:27 AM
961213 Posts in 102752 Topics by 32421 Members
Latest Member: pierreasantos
Home Help Login Register
DIYstompboxes.com  |  DIY Stompboxes  |  Building your own stompbox  |  restoring an old Univox Superfuzz 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: restoring an old Univox Superfuzz  (Read 888 times)
mordechai
Posts: 532


restoring an old Univox Superfuzz
« on: May 30, 2012, 03:42:06 PM »

I have an original (ca. 1968-69) Univox Superfuzz, and it's not performing very well.  It is pretty low gain, and when I switch to the scooped tone, the signal is noisy and sounds like it could cut out. 

Does anybody know a service where I can send this thing to be restored to its original glory?
Logged
R.G.
more
Posts: 15944


WWW
Re: restoring an old Univox Superfuzz
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2012, 07:16:51 PM »

If you build effects, you're qualified to restore this one.

See http://geofex.com/fxdebug/fxdebug.htm and click on the link that is titled "Resuscitating the elderly effect".
Logged

R.G.

Every single NASA manned mission starting with the Gemini series has carried a roll of duck tape.
Yes, really. Look it up.
mordechai
Posts: 532


Re: restoring an old Univox Superfuzz
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2012, 08:33:28 PM »

Thanks R.G.  From what I described, could these problems stem for electrolytic caps that are just shot?
Logged
R.G.
more
Posts: 15944


WWW
Re: restoring an old Univox Superfuzz
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2012, 09:30:28 PM »

It's possible.

In any case, refurbing that thing will involve replacing the dozen or so electro caps in it. They're over fifty years old, if original.  The resistors, non-electro caps, and semiconductors don't have the same wear-out mechanism that electro caps do. Replacing electros, remelting all the solder joints, and cleaning/replacing all mechanical switch contacts will cure the vast majority of old effects.

Even if that's not all of it, once you get there, you can apply the techniques of "What to do when it doesn't work" and "When good opamps go bad".

Come on, there are only a dozen electros in there, all 1uF and/or 10uF as I (dimly...) remember. How bad could it be?
Logged

R.G.

Every single NASA manned mission starting with the Gemini series has carried a roll of duck tape.
Yes, really. Look it up.
joegagan
Posts: 3142



WWW
Re: restoring an old Univox Superfuzz
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2012, 10:47:25 PM »

I replaced the electros and one transistor on this one four years ago. Without the cap replacements, it hardly made a sound. the trans needed replacing due to a botched earlier repair.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChvmvnBYG7Y" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChvmvnBYG7Y</a>
Logged

my life is a tribute to the the great men and women who held this country together when the world was in trouble. my debt cannot be repaid, but i will do my best.
R.G.
more
Posts: 15944


WWW
Re: restoring an old Univox Superfuzz
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2012, 10:22:11 AM »

While they don't have any built-in wearout mechanism that's perceptible on a human scale, BJTs can be damaged subtly. This was not recognized until the 80s? 90s? and is even today not all that widely known.

If you reverse-break the base-emitter of a BJT even once, it makes it a bit more noisy. It gets noisier as you go, and eventually the gain starts to drop. Early transistor circuits did not take this into account and often had a big emitter capacitor or similar that could reverse-break the emitter junction at power-off. The accumulation over time can make especially the input transistor of a BJT amp get funky. This is one reason that old effects are often noisy. Well, one more reason.  icon_biggrin
Logged

R.G.

Every single NASA manned mission starting with the Gemini series has carried a roll of duck tape.
Yes, really. Look it up.
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to: