Hello,
The build layout mentions some germanium diodes v.F 0.300.
I wonder what would be the most logical choice between OA1182 v.F 0.255, or D9E v.F 0.345 ?
(https://i.postimg.cc/0rtxGx3y/Guyatone-PS-024-Distortion-H.png) (https://postimg.cc/0rtxGx3y)
IMHO, don't bother too much about forward voltage drop..
As far as I can see (no schematic found), those diodes are wired in series, via a 10k resistor, with another pair of Si diodes to GND so total clipping threshold also depends on Si diodes v.F and current through 10k resistor..
For Ge diodes of v.F lower than 300mV you could raise 10k resistor value where for higher than 300mV v.F you could lower 10k resistor value..
P.S.
Weird to see a 10nF cap for "smoothing" Si clipping corners and not a respective one across Ge diodes..
AA112 might be 0.28-0.29.
But I believe (well, we all know) that Antonis is right.
Other things matter more than slight differences in diodes. IMHO.
Antonis follows Shockley diode equation:
ID = IS(eqVD/NkT − 1)
where,
ID = Current through the PN junction
IS = p-n junction saturation current
e = Euler's number ≈ 2.718281828
q = Electron unit charge, 1.6 ×10−19 coulombs
VD = Voltage across the PN junction
N = Nonideality/Emission coefficient (between 1 & 2)
k = Boltzmann's constant, 1.38 ×10−23
T = Junction temperature (oK)
which is simplified to:
ID = IS(eVD/0.026 − 1)
for N=1 and kT/q = 26mV (at room temperature)
and further simplified to:
ID = IS(eVD/0.026)
for VD > 115mV, due to (-1) term less than 1% significance
Transforming the above equation for VD results into: VD = 0.026 ln(ID/IS)
The forward voltage drop difference for various currents can be fould via: 0.026 ln(ID2/ID1)
(e.g. for doubling any given current, the voltage drop difference is 18mV - irrespective of both IS and actual current level)
The other way to think about this question: offhanded descriptions of vF are not worth taking as gospel: that number depends in how tested. Unless you have the same machine (or testing set up) as the other guy, you are blind guys describing the elephant in the dark.
And diodes for clippintg are a matter of taste...or faith...
AFIK that unit is similar to a Boss HM-2. The germanium diodes are not clippers but "anti clippers" which act like a noise gate.
Just the same, the same things apply, best to try them. I doubt you will hear much difference in *tone*.
Are you able to breadboard to try out, incl the R compensation suggested?
Or socket those parts?
Or perhaps some elaborate 4PDT for both configurations as you are now becomen the master of? :D
Quote from: Rob Strand on April 27, 2023, 02:37:36 AM
AFIK that unit is similar to a Boss HM-2. The germanium diodes are not clippers but "anti clippers" which act like a noise gate.
Thanx Rob.. :icon_wink:
On a layout second glance, 1k + Ge + 10k & Si diodes form a "voltage divider", the junction of which goes to IC2 pin 5 via a 150nF cap..
(https://i.imgur.com/pxCWXrA.png)
So, for sure, clipping thresholds don't add..
Quote from: antonis on April 27, 2023, 06:15:16 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/pxCWXrA.png)
D1 and D2 are definitely the noise gate Rob mentioned, known as "coring diodes". It's unusual to see applications of crossover distortion, but this is one. Until the signal gets over the Vf of those, there's no background noise. Then after that 10K/D3/D4 is a typical hard-clipper as found in a million places from the DOD250 /RAT/onwards.
Choice of the germanium diodes is a trade-off. If you increase the VF, you increase the noise gate threshold, but also you increase the crossover distortion and chop off more of the note's decay. Smaller Vf gives you less crossover distortion and smoother note decay, but lowers the threshold. Somewhere there's the right balance!
For heavy chugging, it's probably not that critical, since you're not looking for a smooth decay and any crossover distortion will get lost amongst everything else.
HTH
Thanks for your replies ! I am having some troube to finish this build.
Looks like it's a simplified clone of Dead End Fx's Hive :
http://dirtboxlayouts.blogspot.com/2021/10/guyatone-ps-024-distortion-h.html
Schematics : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Vs2NACcV8-uVlz0vmkIlmWbyJIM-HoQm/view
I only have a signal in bypass, despite all my efforts.
DC 9V+ : 9.86V
Q1 BC550C, oriented according to layout :
E= 3.713 V
B= 3.954 V
C= 9.59 V
Q2 BC550C
E= 4.47 V
B= 5.02 V
C= 9.59 V
Q3 BC550C
E= 4.49 V
B= 5.06 V
C= 9.59 V
IC1 RC4558P
1= 5.22 V 8= 9.59 V
2= 5.18 V 7= 5.17 V
3= 5.14 V 6= 5.17 V
4= 0 V 5= 5.17 V
IC2 RC4558P
1= 5.16 V 8= 9.59 V
2= 5.18 V 7= 5.19 V
3= 5.15 V 6= 5.19 V
4= 0 V 5= 5.3 V
IC3 M5226P
1= 5.05 V 16= 0 V
2= 4.34 V 15= 5.17 V
3= 5.05 V 14= 9.59 V
4= 4.35 V 13= 5.15 V
5= 5.05 V 12= 5.18 V
6= 4.35 V 11= 5.15 V
7= 5.05 V 10= 4.35 V
8= 4.36 V 9= 5.05 V
(https://i.postimg.cc/RW0YZgfM/Screenshot-2023-04-27-at-20-32-12-M5226-P-Datasheet-2-8-Pages-MITSUBISHI-5-ELEMENT-GRAPHIC-EQUALIZER.png) (https://postimg.cc/RW0YZgfM)
All EQ potentiometers's lug 1 are connected together and to "All band 1" pad. Every lug 3 are connected together and to "All band 3" pad.
The Distortion pot's lug 3 is connected to lug 2 with a jumper, lug 1 and 2 are wired to the board as instructed.
(https://i.postimg.cc/ZWRysNk7/Pot20numbering.jpg) (https://postimg.cc/ZWRysNk7)
(https://i.postimg.cc/vcsbqwnc/IMG-20230427-195949.jpg) (https://postimg.cc/vcsbqwnc)
(https://i.postimg.cc/GHxr6gPz/IMG-20230427-200023.jpg) (https://postimg.cc/GHxr6gPz)
(https://i.postimg.cc/8sWTmzj2/IMG-20230427-200158.jpg) (https://postimg.cc/8sWTmzj2)
(https://i.postimg.cc/JHbmrPfr/IMG-20230427-200548.jpg) (https://postimg.cc/JHbmrPfr)
I wonder if you can spot something suspicious, on the voltage readings or on the pictures ?
I don't like Q1 VBE..
(actually, I don't like VB)
You are quite serious with the cuts...
Probably nothing but in pic 3, NW corner there are a few cases of frayed wire not cut off.
Sooner or later they can cause issues IMHO.
One of the cuts middleish and south seems to ha e residue copper from the trace going off, but could be fooled by the see-through cuts.
/my five centimes worth...
Quote from: antonis on April 27, 2023, 03:34:15 PM
I don't like Q1 VBE..
(actually, I don't like VB)
I'm not sure what I can do about Q1 voltages, but at least it passes signal on each legs.
I audio probed the circuit, following the layout and DEFX schematics.
It stops after IC1. Near IC1 pad 1, I have a loud signal at the 1uF positive leg, but not on the negative side, nor on the 10k following it. According to Hive schematics, I should have a signal here, right ?
(https://i.postimg.cc/QVQYkFrK/Screenshot-2023-04-27-at-22-02-34-WEM-Project-5-brd-HIVE-BUILD-DOCUMENT-1-pdf.png) (https://postimg.cc/QVQYkFrK)
(https://i.postimg.cc/qgJDwkBm/Guyatone-PS-024-Distortion-H2.png) (https://postimg.cc/qgJDwkBm)
Edit: This cap negative side wasn't on the right row. I have signal at IC2 now. Not at the output jack, unfortunately.
I'll keep probing, and find the next mistake....
Quote from: eh la bas ma on April 27, 2023, 04:05:33 PM
(https://i.postimg.cc/QVQYkFrK/Screenshot-2023-04-27-at-22-02-34-WEM-Project-5-brd-HIVE-BUILD-DOCUMENT-1-pdf.png) (https://postimg.cc/QVQYkFrK)
[It stops after IC1.
It's IC3 that I see on the schematic you'Ve posted, but no matter.
Quote
Near IC1 pad 1, I have a loud signal at the 1uF positive leg, but not on the negative side, nor on the 10k following it. According to Hive schematics, I should have a signal here, right ?
You're talking about that C9/1uF, right? Yes, you should have signal on both sides of that.
Quote from: eh la bas ma on April 27, 2023, 04:05:33 PM
Quote from: antonis on April 27, 2023, 03:34:15 PM
I don't like Q1 VBE..
(actually, I don't like VB)
I'm not sure what I can do about Q1 voltages,
Let it be.. :icon_wink:
Low Base voltage is probably due to DMM loading..
Although it's a terrible schematic, let's have a reference:
(https://i.imgur.com/30mAWGr.png)
Quote from: matopotato on April 27, 2023, 03:54:19 PM
You are quite serious with the cuts...
Probably nothing but in pic 3, NW corner there are a few cases of frayed wire not cut off.
Sooner or later they can cause issues IMHO.
One of the cuts middleish and south seems to ha e residue copper from the trace going off, but could be fooled by the see-through cuts.
/my five centimes worth...
Thanks, these two suspicous aera have been secured.
I always like a good clean cut, to avoid shorts. Shorts are evil. Philonide, greek poet born in -600 said :
"We must cut the evil at its root". I might humbly add : "let's use a small drilling machine to do it, and it will be even more fun"
Quote from: eh la bas ma on April 27, 2023, 04:50:20 PM
Philonide, greek poet born in -600
>spam on<
If you're talking about Philonides of Laodicea, he was an Epicurean philosopher and mathematician, born in 200 BCE.. :icon_wink:
>spam off<
Now, according to above posted schematic, till where you have signal..??
Quote from: antonis on April 27, 2023, 05:06:00 PM
Quote from: eh la bas ma on April 27, 2023, 04:50:20 PM
Philonide, greek poet born in -600
>spam on<
If you're talking about Philonides of Laodicea, he was an Epicurean philosopher and mathematician, born in 200 BCE.. :icon_wink:
>spam off<
Thank you for this correction.
It's working....
Wouhouuuu ! Ayyaaaaah !
There's a 82n cap at the end of the signal path, it's a bit dodgy on my build, signal comes and goes when i touch it. I'll have to reflow the aera, and see if everything is fine inside the box. Every controls are working... I'll make a build report once i've played a bit with the circuit.
Thank you for your help !
Those MKT (82nF and 5nF) caps aren't much convenient, are they..?? :icon_wink:
(I bet their voltage rating is higher than 63V)
P.S.
Out of curiosity, I can't get the reason for binding 2 gyrators (L1 & L2) for LOWs, set via a single pot, and use an extra Emitter follower (Q3) for HIGHs ..
Meaning, simultaneously varying 2 bands for LOWs (81Hz & 173Hz) seems to me like an overkill..
(especially when there isn't any single gyrator left availiable..)
QuoteThose MKT (82nF and 5nF) caps aren't much convenient, are they..?? :icon_wink:
(I bet their voltage rating is higher than 63V)
If you have 100nF's maybe easier to change the resistor from 100k to 82k.
When I see 5nF, someone has either converter (the text/value) 4n7 to 5n for polys or the original pedal used a 5n ceramic.
I changed the big 82n for a smaller one.
Could also has been a tiny strand of wire coming out of the board and creating shorts with the next wire. I fixed two suspicious wiring pads.
Here is the build report, with audio samples and some observations on the 5-bands graphic EQ :
https://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/index.php?topic=36392.msg1265905#msg1265905