DIYstompboxes.com

DIY Stompboxes => Building your own stompbox => Topic started by: jbord39 on June 01, 2010, 01:16:01 PM

Title: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 01, 2010, 01:16:01 PM
Hey guys.  I am working on the Le Craquiement Thermonique pedal with superhot/hot additions.  Here is the picture:

(http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb292/frequencycentral/LeCraquementThermionique3.jpg)

Here is a list of the modifications I had to make to the layout:

I am using a 7805 with two diodes connected to ground, raising the output voltage to 6.2V (Verified with multimeter) instead of the 7806.
I am using a 5.1V zener instead of a 9V zener.  I would guess that this is the problem, except that the problem occurs later in the circuit.

My problem is that the output signal is extremely attenuated; about 5mV p-p; although it is following the input signal and changing with all the buttons/switches.
From the tone potentiometer; I am getting a good; approximately 10V p-p waveform; however from there on the signal is greatly attenuated and very quiet.  I am measuring the signal from the tone pot at the top node (.0047 uF and 47kOhm in the same node).  The tube glowing a little orange; and seems to be working.

Thanks for any help,

John

This is my first time using a tube and most likely that is the problem.
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: PRR on June 01, 2010, 07:49:29 PM
DC voltages on tube pins 1(G), 8(K), 7(G2), 5(P) ??
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: frequencycentral on June 01, 2010, 08:14:57 PM
Got the MOSFET the right way around? I believe the BS170 has different pinouts by manufacturer. The zener shouldn't be a problem - it will work with no zener, or with a 1n4148 - is the zener the right way around? Though I guess if you're getting good signal between the tonestack and the tube, the issue must be with the tube? got the the tube pinout correct? What layout are you using? I haven't had the chance to verify my layout yet, the board is populated but not in a pedal yet.....
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 01:03:38 AM
Thanks for the replies.

The pin readouts are:

Pin 1, 5, 7: 13-14V DC readout using DMM.  Using oscilloscope, I can see a 10 mV p-p signal on each of these.
Pin 8: few mV

From the tonestack, there is a capacitor leading into pin 1.  Taking the voltage across the capacitor, it is a few volts (around 6) peak to peak with the waveform.  The rest of the waveform is attenuated across the resistor.  I tried replacing the capacitor but it didn't help. 

I also checked the mosfets datasheet and the pins seem right.

I am building the layout on a breadboard; would a picture of the breadboard help?
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: frequencycentral on June 02, 2010, 07:44:59 AM
Yeah, photos would help. Also, are you sure the 1M at pin 1 actually is a 1M (not a 1K !).
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 01:14:10 PM
Yeah, I've checked every resistor value; and double checked the nodes for shorts.

(http://i790.photobucket.com/albums/yy185/jbord39/DSCF0579.jpg)

Here is a picture of the setup.  The part on the PC board is everything up to tone potentiometer, which has a black lead (bad choice, no other wire) into the capacitor on the breadboard.

The two wires on top of the breadboard (red, orange) are linking ground and V+ on each side of the breadboard.

The top left of the breadboard is the 7805 with two diodes boosting it's output to 6.2V.  This is working.

The pins from the 5840 are spaced two nodes apart, I know it's hard to see.

I am pretty sure that up to the tonestack is correct; I am getting strong waveforms.  For some reason pin 1 of the 5840 seems like it can't be supplied more than a few mV.  I tried removing the capacitor (which was taking most of the AC voltage for some reason) and the waveform shrunk.  I also tried placing an LED from pin 1 to ground, and the LED would only barely light up, even with the capacitor removed.

Thanks for all the help; I really want to try this pedal!

John
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 01:30:48 PM
Update:

I tried applying a 10 V p-p signal directly to pin 1; with a resistor from pin 1 to ground.  The signal was attenuated to about 2V.  I also tried applying the signal from the tonestack to a resistor connected to ground.  It was a solid, good waveform; so I am pretty sure that up to the tonestack things are working.  I also tried applying various other signals in different combinations to pin 1; and it seems like all of the signals were attenuated into the 10's of mV range.

Thanks again,

John
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: frequencycentral on June 02, 2010, 02:09:02 PM
It's hard to tell from the photo, but it looks like the 7805 is feeding pin 2?

One of the 'building blocks' of this circuit is this tube boost: http://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/index.php?topic=76356.0

As you have got everying else working, it might be worth your while building the tube boost section in isolation, and then applying the rest of the circuit to it's input.
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 02:39:22 PM
I checked the pin, and it's connected to 3.  Is it possible that my tube could be bad?  I tried building just the tube boost; which I also double checked everything for--the same problem happens.

Thanks again,

John
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: frequencycentral on June 02, 2010, 03:18:25 PM
Hmmm, pins 2, 4 and 8 are internally connected, anything externally connected to pins 2 or 4? A bad tube is unlikely but possible I suppose.
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 03:42:24 PM
Here are some pictures of just the booster; along with an oscilloscope frame.

(http://i790.photobucket.com/albums/yy185/jbord39/DSCF0580-1.jpg)

(http://i790.photobucket.com/albums/yy185/jbord39/DS0006.jpg)

The yellow waveform is taken at pin 1.  The blue waveform is taken at the input.
The output is the same as the yellow waveform with the potentiometer turned all the way up.

The input is hooked up to a function generator with a 560 Hz sine wave.

V+ is being powered by +12 V.

I can't figure out why the capacitor is taking so much of the AC... shouldn't the capacitor take the DC voltage and pass the AC component?  The signal is being attenuated from about 7V to like 40 mV.

I have double checked everything twice now...

Thanks for all your help,

John
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: frequencycentral on June 02, 2010, 03:46:06 PM
I'm still not convinced that you have the pinout correct. Can you post some photos of the tube not taken from above, so I can confirm the pinout? It still looks to me like you have the 7805 feeding pin 2, with pin 7 connected to ground.
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 04:05:40 PM
Here are pictures taken from each side.  The bottom of the tube is supposed to have a larger gap than the other spaces, correct?

(http://i790.photobucket.com/albums/yy185/jbord39/DSCF0582.jpg)

(http://i790.photobucket.com/albums/yy185/jbord39/DSCF0583.jpg)

From my first picture of the tube from above, I am assuming the pinout is like this:

  4 5
 3   6
 2   7
  1 8

In these pictures, a white wire connects 6 to ground.

Would I need to be worried about breaking the tube if I just flip it 180 degrees to see if that works?
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: PRR on June 02, 2010, 04:39:03 PM
>> DC voltages on tube pins 1(G), 8(K), 7(G2), 5(P) ??

> Pin 1, 5, 7: 13-14V DC readout using DMM.  


Pin 1, Grid, MUST be zero volts.

Pin 8, Cathode, is likely something under 100mV.

That both are up near a 12V level says that you don't have a ground here.

Pinout:

Is the tube lit-up? (might be dim; turn off the lights.) Or does it get warm? If not, then you do not have 6V across the correct pins 3 and 6.

You have to see the bottom of the tube, not shown in your shots. It would be a 9-pin circle except one pin is missing. Looking at the bottom, pins are numbered from the gap, clockwise.

Also: pull the tube, ass-ume a pin number plan, and start poking with an ohm meter. Pins 2 4 and 8 should be dead-short to each other. If not, but some other three pins are, you mis-numbered, try the other way. Then pins 3 and 6 should be near-short, around 100-200 ohms. All other pins should not connect to any other.
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 04:45:10 PM
The tube does light up, and get warm.  Using the pinout you're describing (the same one I am using on the breadboard, too), pins 2, 4, and 8 are all shorted.  Pins 3 and 6 have a resistance of 5.2 ohms--not 100-200.  Could this be the problem?

Also, how can pin 1 be zero?  Isn't the input signal supposed to be applied to pin 1?

Here are the readouts with no input signal on the boost.

1: 10.3V
2: few mV's
3: 6.3V
4: few mV's
5: 10.3V
6: few mV's
7: 10.3V
8. few mV's

Thanks again
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: frequencycentral on June 02, 2010, 05:20:28 PM
Quote from: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 04:05:40 PM
From my first picture of the tube from above, I am assuming the pinout is like this:

  4 5
 3   6
 2   7
  1 8


You have the pinout incorrect. From above it should be:

    5  4 
6        3
7        2
  8      1

Check out the 'from below' (ie looking at the pins) diagram in the box (bottom right) on the schematic.
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 05:33:34 PM
Thanks so much!!! It's working!

John
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: frequencycentral on June 02, 2010, 05:34:41 PM
Quote from: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 05:33:34 PM
Thanks so much!!! It's working!

John

And it sounds..................?  :icon_mrgreen:
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: PRR on June 02, 2010, 05:39:33 PM
Pins 3 and 6 have a resistance of 5.2 ohms--not 100-200

Lift one of these leads. I bet you measured in-circuit, and were measuring the voltage regulator more than the filament. But if it is clearly lit-up, don't even worry about it.

> Isn't the input signal supposed to be applied to pin 1?

Pin 1 is (should be) at zero volts DC plus the audio signal.

Since the DC voltages look wrong, don't apply audio now, it just confuses things. We want to get near zero on Grid, tenth-volt on Cathode, 4V-11V on Plate.
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 02, 2010, 09:22:44 PM
It sounds really good.  Thanks for all the help.

I have studied transistors in college but we do not cover cathode ray tubes.  Is there a way that they relate, ex. Does the gate correspond to any part of the CRT?

-
John
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: PRR on June 03, 2010, 04:18:59 PM
> we do not cover cathode ray tubes

CRTs??? Nobody uses them any more. (Yeah, you can find a CRT TV or PC monitor here or there, and oscilloscopes still are made with CRTs, but LCDs with CPUs are taking over.)

Is this a sharp left turn? Or are you thinking the tube in this pedal is a CRT?

> Does the gate correspond to any part of the CRT?

An amplifier vacuum tube is very much like a J-FET. Grid is gate, cathode is source, plate is drain. If they taught basic simple J-FET circuits, you have seen the gate tied to ground via a large resistor (current is near zero so a large resistor gives no voltage drop and negligible loading of the signal input). The source is stood-up on a few-K resistor. The drain-source path passes current, so this resistor makes a 0.5V-3V voltage drop, which puts the JFET gate-source port somewhere between OFF and ON, where small inputs make larger outputs. The drain is pulled up by a battery (etc).

Differences:

Vacuum is an insulator. You have to get some free electrons in there, typically with a hot cathode.

Silicon conducts better than empty vacuum. Vacuum tubes typically run higher voltage for similar or lower currents than JFETs.

The simplest vacuum tube amplifier, the Triode, has significant internal plate-to-grid negative feedback, giving lower gain and output impedance. A Pentode eliminates this for high voltage gain and high output impedance, similar to a JFET except the pentode needs another connection (Screen, G2).
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 03, 2010, 08:36:29 PM
I was confusing CRT's and the tube amplifier.  We did cover JFET's.

 

Thanks a bunch for the reply, it is very helpful.  What are all the extra pins for?

-John
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 12, 2010, 04:45:14 PM
I just finished putting the circuit in its housing.  There is a very bad, low frequency buzzing (if the tone knob is not turned all the way up it is very loud).  All of the guitar effects still work, but the buzzing is worse with triode switched on, and also without superheated.

Any ideas?

Thanks,

John
Title: Re: Le Craquiement Thermonique (SP?) debugging
Post by: jbord39 on June 12, 2010, 05:15:06 PM
Problem was the wall wart is unregulated. 

Thanks,

John

(By the way, the pedal sounds great!!!)