So I went to play with the values of the slow-down caps C18 and C23 only to find that the 47n ceramics I had in there were not connected to ground. Fixed that, the result being a reduction in noise but no cigar. The slight click is now only audible on switching off, no longer on switchin on. Changed both caps to 100n ceramics and got a much louder "whoop" upon switching. What's that about? I will start experimenting with smaller caps and see what happens.
Another thing is biasing of the Vulcan stages. As it is now, I need to adjust one of four resistors (R12, R13, R14, or R15 for the first and R20, R21, R23, or R24 for the second stage) depending on the transistor I use. That's OK for the breadboard and only a bit annoying for a one-off pedal. But I would like to make several of these, so I would really like to avoid this sort of thing. Unfortunately, even after reading lots of stuff about biasing common emitter stages, I have still not found a *general* explanation on how to design these things in such a way that I can make sure that it will always bias OK as long as the transistors paramters fall in a given range. Lots of simplified explanations out there that are based on assumptions that are invalid here. Does anyone know where to find an actual, full, detailed explanation on BJT common emitter biasing? One that does not skip the dreaded math? Thanks, that'd be great!
I tried "feedback biasing with ground leg" or whatever the scheme is called that the Big Muff uses because I seem to remember reading somewhere that this is less sensitive to hfe variations of the transistor. Unfortunately, it also sounds a lot less good in case of the Vulcan. I may experiment some more with that (especially adding an AC killing cap in the feedback to keep gain and input impedance high) but is it even true that this the better scheme for dealing with hfe variations. Usually the voltage divider biasing scheme is considered "the most stable" but it is rarely specifies what that is supposed to mean.
Cheers,
Andy