Author Topic: LOGO needed  (Read 35223 times)

Thomas P.

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #120 on: January 29, 2007, 06:52:43 AM »
Really great stuff I have seen here!!!
But how is this to be decided?? ???

My guess would be to pick a few and then make a poll...or aron's going to decide it by his own - either way...
god said...
∇ ⋅ D = ρ
∇ x E = - ∂B/∂t
∇ ⋅ B = 0
∇ x H = ∂D/∂t + j
...and then there was light

PKV

  • Guest
Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #121 on: January 29, 2007, 07:58:17 AM »
Really great stuff I have seen here!!!
But how is this to be decided?? ???

My guess would be to pick a few and then make a poll...or aron's going to decide it by his own - either way...

I was wondering the same thing myself...aron?

scardog

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #122 on: January 29, 2007, 08:12:55 AM »
Been reading these forums for quite some time now. Very helpful. And so, as a thank you:


Open to any suggestions/improvements.

gez

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #123 on: January 29, 2007, 09:03:11 AM »
Been reading these forums for quite some time now. Very helpful. And so, as a thank you:


Open to any suggestions/improvements.

Now these are logos!  Simple, elegant and BLUE!
"They always say there's nothing new under the sun.  I think that that's a big copout..."  Wayne Shorter

JimRayden

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #124 on: January 29, 2007, 11:36:38 AM »
Here's a nice blueprint-theme for ya.

Header for the forums (could add a few mojo-items on the desk once I get my camera):



Monochromatic logo:



(Sorry for reusing the same "DIY" as for the Layout Creator but I think the similiarity is a positive thing here.)

---------
Jimbo

d@vide

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #125 on: January 29, 2007, 01:16:18 PM »
good one Jimbo!

PKV

  • Guest
Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #126 on: January 29, 2007, 08:20:06 PM »
a little color couldn't hurt -


aron

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #127 on: January 29, 2007, 09:07:35 PM »
I guess I will make the call myself, but darn, these logos look so good!!!!!!! It will be hard to decide!

choklitlove

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #128 on: January 29, 2007, 09:14:14 PM »
i like the "aron narrows it down, then starts a poll to decide" idea!
my band.                    my DIY page.                    my solo music.

PKV

  • Guest
Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #129 on: January 29, 2007, 09:32:54 PM »
sure, maybe pick three and then everyone votes...

but then again, it's aron's house,  therefore his call. it's just nice to be able to contribute. :icon_biggrin:
« Last Edit: January 29, 2007, 09:43:39 PM by PKV »

aron

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #130 on: January 31, 2007, 03:00:43 AM »
I'm going to let this thread go for the end of the week and then I will choose the ones I like and get some feedback.

Thanks!

Aron

Steben

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #131 on: January 31, 2007, 10:01:00 AM »






With pleasure, aron!
Rules apply only for those who are not allowed to break them

Steben

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #132 on: January 31, 2007, 11:43:14 AM »




For the blue lovers and definitely more practical than my first fancy ideas
Rules apply only for those who are not allowed to break them

Steben

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #133 on: January 31, 2007, 11:46:51 AM »
and here's the switch. not sure if it's too small. and a little shading on the IC pins.



this logo was in my opinion far better with the ground symbol only.  :icon_confused:
Rules apply only for those who are not allowed to break them

Steve Newton

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #134 on: January 31, 2007, 04:10:15 PM »



Steve.
Not my circus, not my monkey.

KerryF

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #135 on: January 31, 2007, 04:15:59 PM »
^-Steve.  You realise that they all say diytompboxes.com with no s.  :icon_eek:

jonathan perez

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #136 on: January 31, 2007, 04:17:19 PM »





haha! mojo to the max! too many lights and too many switches...and too many knobs.

$500
no longer the battle of midway...(i left that band)...

i hate signatures with gear lists/crap for sale....

i am a wah pervert...ask away...

John Lyons

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #137 on: January 31, 2007, 06:43:30 PM »
Yeah, those are the pedals with the misspelled logo, they are worth more cause they are rare!

Seriously though... Those look pretty nice. A little un realistic as far as the switches and LEDs but neat.
Not so great for printing a shirt though...

John

Basic Audio Pedals
www.basicaudio.net/

Steve Newton

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #138 on: January 31, 2007, 07:17:52 PM »
Quote
haha! mojo to the max! too many lights and too many switches...and too many knobs.
If I wasn't lazy they'd all be different types of knob etc.

Yeah, those are the pedals with the misspelled logo, they are worth more cause they are rare!
Damn! I changed the first 4 letters from uppercase to lower and missed the fourth letter!


« Last Edit: January 31, 2007, 07:50:31 PM by Steve Newton »
Steve.
Not my circus, not my monkey.

PKV

  • Guest
Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #139 on: January 31, 2007, 08:49:21 PM »
and here's the switch. not sure if it's too small. and a little shading on the IC pins.



this logo was in my opinion far better with the ground symbol only.  :icon_confused:

I agree - that's why I came up with this one:



It's my submission 'o the moment...