Author Topic: LOGO needed  (Read 35243 times)

keko

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #200 on: February 11, 2007, 09:40:59 PM »
I like nº 2 better.
Nº 8 is fine, but tha "can" transistor is way cooler.

I don't like Nº 7. I read something like Bloomingdales... sorry.

I'd go with number 2 again, with some touch ups. Id' look for a new font. That one loos bulky, too heavy, and old. This is an online forum.
Maybe in a couple of days I can sugges a few ones.
.::keko::.
www.qpd.cl // desahógate ahora!
www.basa.cl // Digital « Design » Atelier

keko

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #201 on: February 13, 2007, 05:02:16 PM »
...so, I took the liberty to modify entry Nº2 (blindsjc, I hope you don't mind), changing the font.

This way (nevermind the color) you separate the three words in the frase using different body weights, but still get a single-word readability. I believe that the use of a more contemporary font-face is also a positive atribute. BTW, the font used is named Delicious, free for personal and commercial use.

.::keko::.
www.qpd.cl // desahógate ahora!
www.basa.cl // Digital « Design » Atelier

Joecool85

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #202 on: February 13, 2007, 09:57:29 PM »
Wow, you guys are really going to town on this.  Great ideas.  While you are at it, someone should design a favicon.  I came up with a few and emailed aron back and forth with them, but none of them were really standout awesome.  So, lets see those favicons as well.
Life is what you make it.
https://www.ssguitar.com

Zero

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #203 on: February 14, 2007, 04:02:12 AM »


This one's the way to go IMHO...  And I also agree that the silicon tranny looks better in this logo.
Maybe a subtle shadow could give it a little more visual "depth" (3-D look).

How about making "stompboxes" capitals as well, but slightly smaller than "DIY"? Just an idea...

Keep up the good work, guys!


The Tone God

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #204 on: February 14, 2007, 02:08:27 PM »
I think the TO-92 look better and is more recognizable to the average person then the can. I like the idea of separating the words by changing the weight of the font.

Andrew

Marcos - Munky

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #205 on: February 14, 2007, 05:15:13 PM »
Just a little suggestion for the can one. What about to make the middle leg shorter? This can give the effect of the middle leg being in the back, and the other legs in the front, like how you see when you look at a can transistor.

bluesdevil

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #206 on: February 14, 2007, 10:46:43 PM »
I think the TO-92 look better and is more recognizable to the average person then the can. I like the idea of separating the words by changing the weight of the font.

Andrew

I'd go with that as well if it was up to me.
"I like the box caps because when I'm done populating the board it looks like a little city....and I'm the Mayor!" - armdnrdy

aron

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #207 on: February 15, 2007, 03:21:04 AM »
I have been evaluating this with different people. I will have an answer soon.

Sam

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #208 on: February 25, 2007, 10:03:21 AM »
"Where's the paper bag that holds the liquor?
Just in case I feel the need to puke." - Silver Jews

aron

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #209 on: February 26, 2007, 04:49:38 PM »
For PKV,

Thanks for your logo entry and thanks for being a member of the forum! Good luck in future projects!

Aron

ambulancevoice

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #210 on: March 10, 2007, 08:50:23 PM »

hehe
i thought i might do an extra symbol for the hell of it
Open Your Mouth, Heres Your Money

Sindran

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #211 on: March 18, 2007, 07:46:39 AM »


This one's the way to go IMHO...  And I also agree that the silicon tranny looks better in this logo.

+1
I just checked this thread for the first time, and have to say this is definitly the one!!!
Not too complicated, simple, stylish.
It's classic...  Believe me. ;D
Many others were really good, but this one just stands out...
« Last Edit: March 18, 2007, 07:48:40 AM by Sindran »

albatross

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #212 on: March 18, 2007, 06:26:33 PM »
I think a site thats well established should have a logo thats set in stone  :icon_idea:





« Last Edit: March 18, 2007, 06:47:21 PM by albatross »

Buddy

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #213 on: March 19, 2007, 12:42:10 PM »




  How 'zat?
               


  Albatross , that uh , rocks ...           
                                B
« Last Edit: March 19, 2007, 12:45:45 PM by Buddy »

albatross

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #214 on: March 19, 2007, 02:19:36 PM »
Hehe I liked that joke, I was bored so I re-made it ;)




JimRayden

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #215 on: March 20, 2007, 06:50:46 AM »
Aron, any further information yet?

---------
Jimbo

Buddy

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #216 on: March 21, 2007, 04:19:35 PM »
Hehe I liked that joke, I was bored so I re-made it ;)






  Cool , but can you  do it  With a melting VTVM  draped over a tree branch . ...
« Last Edit: March 21, 2007, 04:25:31 PM by Buddy »

albatross

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #217 on: March 21, 2007, 04:36:09 PM »
probably if i knew what a VTVM was .. ;)

Buddy

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #218 on: March 21, 2007, 04:55:26 PM »

 VTVM=analog tube fired meter .Good fer checking those leaky caps and whatnot . Accurate down to .5 ohm .
 Yeah ... that old .
                                     But you knew that . :icon_surprised:

aron

Re: LOGO needed
« Reply #219 on: April 24, 2007, 04:35:42 AM »
In the end after talking to multiple people I have decided on blindsjc's logos. I can't really decide between silicon or germanium so I'll alternate and eventually chose one over the other. THANKS EVERYONE for your entries!

Congratulations blindsjc!

See it here....